Choose the format
Choose whether the experiment runs online or in person.
Posting category *
Not IRB research — this posting is a general recruitment that hasn't gone through IRB review. A "Not IRB research" badge is shown to participants. Choose this category for non-research purposes.
Study type
Method
Method
In-person (on site)
Connect experiment code
Upload an HTML file or connect a builder experiment, and participants run it right on the platform.
If you use an external tool like Google Forms or Qualtrics, enter the external experiment link.
Uploads containing external-communication code (fetch, eval, etc.) are blocked from registration.
An on-platform experiment is connected
Number of sessions
2
sessions
Mode per session
Application approval mode
Basic info
Enter the key details shown to participants.
Minimum wage basis (₩10,320/hour)
Enter the time required to calculate.
Legal / ethics info
Enter IRB approval, principal investigator, consent form, and sensitive-data details.
Legal note for in-person experiments
Research consent must be
obtained in writing on site (Bioethics Act Article 16).
Only the
required items below are needed:
- IRB status · institution · approval number · document upload
- PI name · affiliation · contact
- Whether sensitive data is collected
IRB & review info
Conveloq's admin review is solely a publication-approval step. IRB review obligations and the researcher's duty to inform and obtain consent rest with the researcher; Conveloq does not substitute for IRB review or ethical verification.
While under review / amendment needed / admin review needed, only draft saving is possible — the recruitment posting cannot go live.
Participation notice (optional)
This posting is not IRB research. Enter what you want to disclose to participants below.
If you collect personal data or send participants to an external platform, you must describe that here.
Sensitive / high-risk personal data
Sample criteria
Set participant eligibility criteria. Blank items mean no restriction.
Basic criteria Free
Advanced criteria
Free online
In-person +₩5,000
Free during pilot
Using any of the criteria below adds an advanced-criteria fee of +₩5,000. Free during the pilot phase.
Experiment environment Online only
First-pass screening Optional
Verifies the participant's actual environment at application time. Unlike self-reported sample criteria, checked items must actually be passed via a real device check before applying.
This step doesn't apply to in-person experiments — continue to the next step.
Second-pass screening Optional
Sends a message to participants who passed the first-pass criteria (age, gender, etc.) to verify additional eligibility.
Participants meeting first-pass criteria
Checking…
What is strict verification?
A message is sent to participants who passed the first-pass criteria (age, gender, etc.).
Participants must read it, judge for themselves that they qualify, and apply directly for participation to be approved.
Reading the message +₩30 · successful application +₩300 (paid to the participant)
What is normal screening?
A notice message is sent to participants who passed the first-pass criteria.
Reading it pays the participant +₩30 in points. Applications then happen from the message per its screening content.
Screening cost — × ₩30
—
This message is sent to participants; those who choose the matching options get to participate. State the conditions to meet clearly.
Structured questions *
Sent to participants as a message; those who choose the matching options get to participate. Add at least one checkbox/radio question.
QC criteria & sampling
Set participant quality criteria and the recruitment method.
Minimum completion rate (sampling filter) In-person +₩3,000
Participants meeting this threshold are recruited with priority. Not applied to those with fewer than 5 submissions.
Minimum participation experience Included in in-person advanced criteria
Only participants with at least this many completed studies on the platform can apply.
These filters exist to ensure data quality and do not restrict participants' rights.
Responsibility for study design and participation criteria rests with the researcher.
Sampling method
Target counts per dimension